Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a overall score of 81 against 78.8. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker device than the vivo X60 Pro. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a quite bigger display. The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4% bigger battery size.
Vivo X60 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.