Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, getting a general score of 81 against 76.4. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Mi 5s.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more processing cores (but slower). The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a much tinier sensor taking way worse quality images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Galaxy XCover Pro costs more money than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.