Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 85.5 score against 81. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it was released just a bit further than a year before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution, a quite smaller display and a just a bit lower display density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.