Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone 8's 85 score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than the Apple iPhone 8's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 8 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has lesser RAM memory and less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better looking screen than iPhone 8, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a lot larger screen. The iPhone 8 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has an 81% bigger battery size. IPhone 8 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a F1.8 camera aperture and a camera in the back with a 12 MP.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs more money than the Apple iPhone 8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Apple iPhone 8. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.