Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the Apple iPhone XS Max's 84.5 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is noticeably newer, lighter and a little bit thinner than the Apple iPhone XS Max. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has lesser and slower CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a just a little better pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much better storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
IPhone XS Max features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have a back camera with a 12 megapixels and a F1.8 camera aperture. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little better battery life than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.