Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but just a little heavier than Google Nexus 6P. Google Nexus 6P features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel count in each screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 and the Google Nexus 6P both count with similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both have equal internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit faster processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with more mega pixels. The Google Nexus 6P has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Nexus 6P. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Nexus 6P, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.