Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's general score of 83.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction has the same weight than LG V50 ThinQ, but it's thinner.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a processor that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 one, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V50 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.