Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 85.6 score against 77.9. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is way newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is also just a bit heavier. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.