Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 score. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is somewhat thinner than Motorola Edge 50, although it is a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM. Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back camera with lot more MP. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.