Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, having an 85.6 score against 79.7. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, way thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a little greater number of pixels per inch of screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little bigger screen. The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Stylus, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.