Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a 91.8 score against 85.6. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy A71 5G is an older, just a little bit heavier and thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Z Flip 3. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you all the same OS features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a little bit more pixels per display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.