Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-10-02 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Blue, Grey and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is slightly better than Sony Xperia 5's global score of 81. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Sony Xperia 5. The Sony Xperia 5's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although the Sony Xperia 5 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Sony Xperia 5 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Xperia 5 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia 5 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Xperia 5 takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the Xperia 5 also has a bigger camera aperture. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little better battery duration than Xperia 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs more money than Xperia 5, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.