Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ2's 79.1 score. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a much newer device, and it's also a bit lighter and incredibly thinner than Xperia XZ2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZ2 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, a little bit lower pixel density and a quite smaller display. Sony Xperia XZ2 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Xperia XZ2 has a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little bit longer battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.