Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than Sony Xperia XZ3's general score of 79.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has older 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, just a little lighter and way thinner than Sony Xperia XZ3.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little faster processor than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xperia XZ3 shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Sony Xperia XZ3's battery lifetime is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 one, although the Sony Xperia XZ3 also has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a bit more money than Xperia XZ3, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.