Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a global score of 85.6 against 77.8. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is somewhat lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is thicker and was released many years before.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and a way better 50 MP resolution camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 73 percent greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.