Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is notably newer and notably thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, but it's also a bit heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a processor that is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, they have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2246px resolution and a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.