Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than iPhone 8, having a overall score of 92.3 against 85. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer and just a bit thinner phone than the iPhone 8, although it is heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than iPhone 8, because it has a lot larger display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and more pixels per inch of display.
The Apple iPhone 8 has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, both have the same internal memory capacity. IPhone 8 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same camera aperture, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.