Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Google Nexus 6P, although it is just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels amount per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality photos and videos, a lower (4K) video resolution and a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. Google Nexus 6P has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.