Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Google Pixel XL, with a overall score of 92.3 against 81.3. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit heavier than Google Pixel XL, it's thinner and much newer. Google Pixel XL counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per display inch and a bit higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, a lower resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture. Google Pixel XL counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.