Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than LG V20's 77 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way newer and a bit thinner phone than the LG V20, but it's also a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a greater hardware performance than LG V20, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V20 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a lower video resolution and a way less megapixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V20 features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.