Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a noticeably newer and incredibly thinner device than the Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is a little bit heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower video quality and a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.