Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is just a little thinner than Motorola Edge 50, but it's just a little bit heavier and was released 4 years before.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a just a little better pixel count per screen inch. Motorola Edge 50 counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, both of them have equal internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% bigger battery size. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a lot more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.