Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS, so both should offer the same operating system features. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is incredibly thinner and a little lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although they were released with only 4 months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a little better pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit bigger display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a larger aperture, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Moto G Stylus has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.