Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Moto Z4, getting a general score of 92.3 against 79.8. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is newer and a little thinner than the Moto Z4's, but it's also just a little heavier. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it gives some additional features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better looking display than Moto Z4, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
Moto Z4 has a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto Z4 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Moto Z4 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot more MP camera, a bigger aperture and a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more than the Moto Z4, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.