Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Both phones in this review use the same Android 11 OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the OPPO Find X3 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a little greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3216.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features as much memory capacity for games and applications as Galaxy Z Flip 5G, both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photographs and a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.