Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A12's overall score of 80.3. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features and a performance increase. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Samsung Galaxy A12 were only released 5 months apart, Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat thinner and lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a little larger screen, a way higher pixel number per inch in the display and a way higher 1080 x 2636px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A12, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A12 counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Galaxy A12 count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Galaxy A12 has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.