Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A80's score of 84.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is newer, incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy A80. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a just a bit better pixel count per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A80. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy A80 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy A80 counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.