Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-08-07 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, with a score of 92.3 against 90.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has Android 11 operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better processing power than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a quite greater pixels number in each inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2636px resolution.
The Galaxy A90 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.