Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a overall score of 92.3 against 81. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a much newer and just a bit lighter phone than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is also just a little thicker. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a bit better pixels density and a little bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy C9 Pro has improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.