Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, with a 92.3 score against 79.3. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite better performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little higher pixel count in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a way less MP back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is more expensive than Galaxy S6 edge+, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.