Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than the Xperia XZ2's global score of 79.1. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way newer cellphone, and it is also incredibly thinner and just a little lighter than the Xperia XZ2. The Xperia XZ2 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a just a bit lower pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processor than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features more storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xperia XZ2 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xperia XZ2 also counts with a way higher 19 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit longer battery duration than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.