Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Sony Xperia XZ3's 79.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone, and it is also just a little lighter and a lot thinner than Sony Xperia XZ3. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xperia XZ3 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures in low-light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ3 also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Sony Xperia XZ3 features a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy Z Flip 5G one, although the Sony Xperia XZ3 also has a 3330mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.