Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 603.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 92.3 score against 77.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is somewhat lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's much thicker and was released 4 years before.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a larger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.