Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-07 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is a little thinner but just a little heavier than vivo X60 Pro, and they were only released with a few months difference.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo X60 Pro's memory to store more apps and games is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's one, they have equal internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.