Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-07 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 603.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it is also a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit lower pixels number in each screen inch, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a quite smaller display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.