Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than iPhone 11 Pro, getting an 88.5 score against 84.9. Galaxy Z Flip comes with Android 12 OS, and iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS. The Galaxy Z Flip is a thinner and a little bit lighter phone than the iPhone 11 Pro, even though they were released with only 5 months difference.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. The iPhone 11 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3046mAh.
IPhone 11 Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy Z Flip, both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is more expensive than iPhone 11 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as iPhone 11 Pro. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the iPhone 11 Pro, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.