Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 969.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Apple iPhone 7 Plus, getting an 88.5 score against 83.8. Galaxy Z Flip's design is way newer, a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Apple iPhone 7 Plus. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processor than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
The iPhone 7 Plus features just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little smaller display, a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. Galaxy Z Flip takes clearer photos and videos than iPhone 7 Plus, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a camera with a 12 megapixels and a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also has higher video frame rate and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than iPhone 7 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as iPhone 7 Plus. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the iPhone 7 Plus, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.