Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than Apple iPhone XS Max, having an 88.5 score against 84.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and lighter than Apple iPhone XS Max. The iPhone XS Max features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes a little bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS Max. They have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs more money than iPhone XS Max, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.