Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Google Nexus 6P, with an 88.5 score against 80.3. The Galaxy Z Flip is a extremely newer and a bit thinner phone than the Google Nexus 6P, but it is just a little bit heavier. The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit better pixel number per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Nexus 6P. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Nexus 6P, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.