Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Google Pixel 2, with a general score of 88.5 against 81.6. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 2, it's just a bit thinner and incredibly newer. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little higher pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip captures a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution and a worse video definition, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 22% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.