Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 score. Although Galaxy Z Flip is just a little bit heavier than the Google Pixel XL, it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer. Google Pixel XL has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel XL has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more money than Google Pixel XL, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.