Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the LG V20, with an 88.5 score against 77. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit heavier than LG V20, it's a bit thinner and also incredibly newer. Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better processing power than LG V20, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The LG V20 has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a just a bit greater screen pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a worse video definition and a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a larger sensor.
LG V20 counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V20, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.