Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Galaxy Z Flip's design is extremely newer and way thinner, but a bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and more processing cores.
Galaxy Z Flip has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse video quality and a lot less MP back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.