Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with an 88.5 score against 77.9. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy Z Flip's body is a lot newer and way thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is a bit heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a little bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola DROID Turbo features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a much worse resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light images.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.