Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Motorola Moto Z4, with a general score of 88.5 against 79.8. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, giving some nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy Z Flip design is just a bit heavier but just a little thinner than the Motorola Moto Z4, and both were only released 8 months apart.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a little larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit better screen pixel density.
Moto Z4 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto Z4 also counts with a bigger aperture, a lot more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
The Moto Z4 counts with slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto Z4 has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 9 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z4, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.