Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a general score of 88.5 against 79.9. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, counting with some nice extra features and better performance. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is thinner and a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a processor that is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip's CPU, and although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has 4 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3216 resolution and a little higher screen density.
OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro's storage capacity for applications and games is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip's one, both have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.