Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 425 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32, having an 88.5 score against 84.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than Galaxy A32, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 OS, and Galaxy A32 works with Android OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a much better pixels count per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.