Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than Galaxy A60, getting a general score of 88.5 against 82.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is just a little thinner but a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A60, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Galaxy A60 has Android 11.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a quite larger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor.
The Galaxy A60 features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.