Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip's overall score of 88.5. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a little more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.