Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Galaxy A80, with an 88.5 score against 84.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a notably thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A80, even when both of them were only released 9 months apart. Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a quite better pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A80. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Galaxy A80 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.